Overview                              .Introduction                                                   Teaching and Reporting on the Five Strands                           Assessment in Mathematics

Homework                                   Teaching in the Combined Class

wpe2.jpg (11563 bytes)

Overview

Introduction

Why create a curriculum planning guide?
Is this a mandated program?
How is this planning guide organized?

Program Components

Text program components
Other resources available in all schools
Software resources
Recommended supplementary resources
Mathematics manipulatives

Program Overview

Gaps and Optional Activities

Completing the Program: Teacher Selection Required

Developing Proficiency

Addressing and Reporting in Mathematics

Assessment in mathematics
Curriculum alignment
Reporting on the five strands
Strand treatment in current text programs
Preparing for the EQAO provincial assessment

Homework

The role of workbooks

Teaching In The Combined Classroom

Appendices

Curriculum Expectations: Summary
Communication Rubrics for Students and Teachers
Problem Solving Rubric for Teachers
Problem Solving Rubric for Students
4 Steps To Successful Problem Solving

 

Curriculum Planning Guide Units

Unit overview with expectations

Specific activity suggestions

Top Of Page

wpe6.jpg (5157 bytes)

Why create a curriculum planning guide?

The introduction of the new mathematics curriculum has required significant changes in methods of instruction as well as assessment. The current approach, set out in the curriculum, is based on the belief that basic facts and skills are better learned when they evolve from meaningful and purposeful mathematical activities. This guide is designed to help teachers with the planning of their mathematics program for the year. It assumes that the principle resource being used will be the textbook. It also addresses the fact that the textbook does not completely cover all the expectations listed in the Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-8: Mathematics 1997.

wpe4.jpg (11126 bytes)

 

Traditionally the focus of mathematics programs was to teach students a basic set of mathematical facts and skills, often in a very isolated manner. Those basic facts and skills would then be used to develop mathematical concepts. The application of these concepts in problem solving situations was often presented in the latter portion of a unit and students struggled with attaching meaning and purpose to the mathematics they were taught.

 

 

 

wpe5.jpg (11532 bytes)

The current approach to teaching mathematics engages students in meaningful and purposeful situations that give rise to rich problem solving activities. These problem solving opportunities provide students with a context for the development of mathematical concepts. Students then work on developing proficiency with a set of mathematical facts and skills to facilitate applying the mathematical concept to future problem solving situations.

 

 

 

In addition to the development of traditional mathematical skills, the implementation of the new curriculum requires teachers to incorporate the following into their program:

Development of mathematical concepts in all five strands.
Introduction of mathematical concepts through investigation and exploration.
Concrete experiences through extensive use of manipulatives.
Opportunities for students to construct their own mathematical procedures.
Experiences that develop problem-solving skills.
Opportunities for students to develop their ability to communicate their reasoning.
Assessment strategies that go beyond the traditional paper and pencil testing.
Using technology to help solve problems.

As teachers face the challenge of implementing new curricula in all key subjects areas, this guide is intended to help teachers maximize the amount of time they spend preparing meaningful investigations and rich assessment tasks.

 

Is this a mandated program?

These guides are designed to provide an example of one way a teacher may choose to deliver their mathematics program. It is important to emphasize that a complete mathematics program cannot be found in a textbook alone. The text provides the framework upon which to hang the important program components that build students’ mathematical knowledge and understanding, as well as their application, problem solving and communication skills.

How is this planning guide organized?

This planning guide consists of two parts, the first being the overview. In this section of the document, components that apply to the whole program are addressed. They include:

Program resources
Manipulatives
Suggested scope and sequence
Gaps that need to be addressed
Developing Proficiency
Homework
Assessing and reporting student achievement
Suggested strategies for the combined class

The second part of the planning guide correlates each unit in the text program with the expectations in the curriculum. At the beginning of each unit, the expectations addressed are listed and the Ministry coding has been provided.

 The expectations are coded as shown below:

 

In some cases, a unit will only address part of an expectation. When this occurs, the expectation listed in the unit overview will have the part NOT addressed in italics. This part of the expectation is then addressed in another unit.

Throughout the curriculum planning guide, several suggestions have been made, relating to the following:

how long the unit should take
assessment strategies that can be incorporated.
activities that can be omitted (referred to as optional) as they do not address expectations for this grade level or may deal with expectations that have already been addressed in other activities. These activities have been shaded for easy identification.

Each activity has been reviewed and suggestions may appear that relate to one or more of the following;

Problem Highlight: A highly recommended rich problem in the activity
Communication Highlight: A valuable opportunity for students to explain their reasoning or justify their responses.
Assessment Highlight: A opportunity for teachers to incorporate alternative forms of assessment.
Teaching Suggestions: Comments made by experienced teachers relating to successful instructional strategies.
Homework Suggestions: Problems and questions that provide rich mathematical experiences students can take home.

Top Of Page

wpe2.jpg (6174 bytes)

 

 

"Assessment is the gathering, recording and analysis of data about a student’s progress and achievements or about a program’s implementation and effectiveness".

 

 

Implementation Guidelines for Student and Program Assessment

Metropolitan Separate School Board, 1997.

The main purpose for the assessment and evaluation of children is to improve learning and to ensure effective programming. As stated in the Implementation Guidelines for Student and Program Assessment, effective assessment practices must be:

respectful of the self-worth of each student
ongoing and continuous
part of the teaching-learning cycle
diagnostic, formative, and summative
reflective of both process and product
appropriate
bias-free
varied
communicated regularly to stakeholders (students, parents/guardians, others)

Traditional mathematics programs focussed instruction on one topic or area of mathematics at a time, with an emphasis on the mastery of traditional paper and pencil algorithms and formulas. Today the vision of mathematics calls for reasoning, problem solving, communication, and making connections across the strands of mathematics and with other areas of the curriculum. Teachers are encouraged to engage students in "rich learning tasks" that often integrate the strands. The assessment of these tasks should reflect their multi-stranded approach.

A complete mathematics program includes open-ended investigations, co-operative group experiences and thought provoking activities all designed to provide students with meaningful experiences that will develop their problem solving and communication skills. What we assess, communicates to students what we think is important.

 

The Ontario Curriculum, Mathematics (1997) states

"A student will be assessed on how well he or she solves problems, shows understanding of concepts, applies mathematical procedures, and communication of knowledge. For each of these categories there are four levels of achievement."

A chart describing student performance for each of the four knowledge and skills categories can be found on page 9 of The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-8. These categories help teachers assess how well a student has met the expectations. Teachers need to continue to develop strategies for assessing how well a student solves problems, shows understanding of concepts, applies mathematical procedures, and communicates required knowledge. Some suggestions are listed below:

 

Strategies for Assessing the Four Categories in Achievement Chart

Knowledge and Understanding Concepts:
Strategies
Describing and demonstrating the concept
Giving examples and non-examples
Representing concepts with manipulatives, diagrams or symbols from different contexts
Comparing and contrasting concepts
Integrating knowledge of concepts
Assessment Tools
Quizzes
Tests
True/False
Multiple Choice
In Class Question and Answer
Assessing Application of Mathematical Procedures
Strategies
Recognizing when a procedure is appropriate
Using procedures accurately
Giving reasons for the steps used in a procedure
Checking the results of their procedures
Identifying correct and incorrect procedures
Assessment Tools
Quizzes
Tests
Open-ended Questions
Discussion
Oral Examiniation
Design of Products
Assessing Problem Solving (Thinking and Inquiry):
Strategies
Using "Inquiry Model"
Selecting strategies
Using technology
Making connections
Applying mathematics
Posing and solving problems
Creating new strategies
Assessment Tools
Performance Assessment Tasks
Investigations
Reports
Open-ended Questions
Student/Teacher Conference
Articles and Essays
Assessing Communication:
Strategies
Using mathematical terminology and notation correctly
Describing what they are thinking
Connecting prior knowledge to new
Reading and interpreting math presented in words and visuals
Presenting accurately and effectively with tables, charts, etc.
Asking questions to further thinking
Making hypotheses and conjectures
Justifying their thinking
Assessment Tools
Journals
Investigations
Discussions
Explanations
Performance Assessment Tasks
Oral Presentations
Student/Teacher Interviews

Adapted from "Getting Assessment Right: Mathematics" by Damien Cooper, Nanci-Wakeman-Jones, Pat Blake, Data Based Directions

Assessing students under the four knowledge and skills categories requires strategies that go beyond using the traditional paper and pencil test or quiz. It has been said that using one assessment for a wide range of purposes is like using a hammer for a wide range of jobs from pile driving to brain surgery. Additional assessment tools, such as the ones described in the chart above, are needed. The text programs currently available offer extensive support for teachers by providing a positive and balanced assessment plan. Look for references to assessment tools that include:

teacher observation (observations must be focussed and need to be recorded: checklists may be useful)
portfolio assessment
performance assessment tasks
teacher/child interviews
student self and peer assessment
mathematical investigations
paper and pencil assessment

In addition to ensuring students have the opportunities to meet expectations addressed by all four knowledge and skills categories, teachers need to develop an understanding of what student performance looks like at all four levels of achievement. Consistency will be achieved when teachers develop a common understanding of what student work looks like at all four levels of achievement, given any grade or category . To help support teachers in this process the Ministry of Education has released mathematics exemplars which provide samples of student work to review and discuss with colleagues. Teachers are also encouraged to collect samples of student work at each of the four levels of performance and use them as examples for students to see. Parents will also find examining samples of student work helpful.

Curriculum Alignment:

  wpe7.jpg (35056 bytes)

 

"Programs that are aligned - curriculum, teaching and assessment - have a greater chance of success for students."

Glenda Lappan, President National Council for Teachers of Mathematics

(Oct 1998)

 

 

 

 

 

As we continue to implement the new curriculum, we will work towards ensuring that the three circles above eventually align into one. When this happens, the curriculum delivered in the classroom, along with the curriculum that is being assessed with be based on the curriculum expectations in the Ontario Mathematics Curriculum.

Additional information on assessment can be found in Mathematics Assessment: Myths, Models, Good Questions, and Practical Suggestions (NCTM, 1991). This document (yellow cover) was provided to all schools in 1995.

Top Of Page

Reporting On The Five Strands

The Ministry of Education and Training requires teachers to report on student achievement in each of the five strands in mathematics. In the past, teachers were required to report on three strands in the first term and all five strands in the second and third terms. The policy for reporting on the five strands was amended on September 1, 2000. The new policy is as follows and replaces the policy stated in the Guide to the Provincial Report Card, Grades 1-8, 1998.

First, Second, and Third Reporting Periods. Fill in the student’s grade/mark for each strand that is part of the student’s instructional program. If a particular strand is not part of the student’s program during a reporting period, indicate this in the comments and leave the grade/mark column blank.

A grade/mark must be filled in for each strand at least two reporting periods, and each reporting period must show a grade/mark for at least two strands.

This planning guide has been organized to reflect the change in policy. In the overview, each strand has been addressed in two of the three reporting periods. The suggested strands for each reporting period have been identified in the scope and sequence chart. It is important to note that reporting on student achievement, for all subject areas, is not cumulative from one term to another. It is to reflect what the student has achieved during each specific term.

Strand Treatment in Current Text Programs

Current text programs tend to address more than one strand in a unit, although the name of the unit may suggest otherwise. For example, in the Quest 2000, grade 6, unit 1 "Exploring Relationships and Graphs", while the major focus is on Data Management and Patterning and Algebra, all of the other strands are addressed in varying degrees.

To assist teachers in identifying the strands addressed in each unit, this curriculum planning guides correlates each unit to the mathematics expectations from the Ontario Curriculum. Each unit overview lists the expectations being addressed. The scope and sequence chart is designed to assist teachers with planning assessment and evaluation for their program. Local needs may require teachers to make some adjustments.

Preparing for the EQAO Provincial Assessment in Mathematics

The best way to prepare students for the Grade 3, 6 and 9 EQAO assessments in mathematics is to ensure that students have the opportunity to meet the expectations in the rich ways described in the curriculum. Students need to be actively involved in exploring, investigating, problem-solving, reasoning, justifying, manipulating, applying and communicating. This, by no means, is a one year job. Students need to develop these skills throughout the Primary, Junior and Intermediate programs. Although sample assessment tasks are available, simply exposing students to these "practice" opportunities is not enough. Embedding investigations, and problems, such as those administered by EQAO, into the regular mathematics program, will best prepare our students for these assessments.

Top Of Page

wpe8.jpg (4396 bytes)

All learning activities must be carefully selected to help students meet the broad range of expectations listed in the Ontario Curriculum for Mathematics. This also applies to homework. The teacher must ensure that the homework program offers a variety of activities that meet the specific needs of all students in the class. Homework assignments should be manageable for both child and parent. Although the amount of homework will vary, it should be included regularly.

Homework should take on a variety of forms that include:

Working on mathematical investigations or math projects
Completing work assigned and started in class
Solving special problems
Working on Family Math activities that encourage parental involvement
Reviewing a concept or skill
Remedial work for individual practice of a skill to gain competence
Enrichment for individual challenges
Catching up on missed work due to an absence
Practising computational skills

Careful consideration must be given to the amount and type of homework assigned. Monitor how long students are spending on their mathematics homework. Get feedback from both students and parents. If a student seems to be struggling with homework, it may be appropriate to modify the workload.

Some parents have expressed concern over not being able to help their children with an investigation or activity because they are not familiar with the expectations being addressed. Be careful not to send home activities designed as a group investigation or requiring significant teacher direction. Research tells us that parents are very comfortable with helping their children develop proficiency with the traditional skills. Ensure that the homework provides ample opportunity for parents to support your program in this way.

The Role Of Workbooks

Please note that there are several publishers who are marketing homework books. They include "Quest 2000: Homework and Practice" by Addison Wesley Longman, "Connections In Math" by Guerin and "My Ontario Math Workbook" by Irwin. You may wish to recommend these workbooks to parents who wish to supplement the mathematics program with extra practice for their children. These workbooks focus primarily on helping students consolidate skills. Some teachers have considered using these wrokbooks as part of their program. Teachers must always guard against reducing their mathematics program to a series of drill and practice exercises that primarily engage students in the rote memorization of procedures and may rob them of the time to experience rich opportunities to develop a solid understanding of the key concepts.

Top Of Page

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teaching the current math program in a combined grade situation is quite a challenge and there is no perfect answer to the problem of how best to handle it. This challenge arises from the fact that an effective mathematics program requires students to work in cooperative groups, use manipulative materials, solve problems, and communicate.

The publishing companies and teachers have developed strategies for teaching in a combined classroom. The following are some suggestions you may wish to consider. A combination of these suggested strategies is recommended based on the individual and whole group needs of your class.

 

Teaching the Grades Together Where Topics Match

Identify topics/Ontario Curriculum expectations that match
Use the lower grade Teacher’s Guide and provide extensions and additional challenges for the higher grades or use the higher grade Teacher’s Guide and make modifications for the lower grade (choice of Teacher’s Guide will depend on make-up of class)
Instruct the group separately for topics/Ontario Curriculum expectations that do not match.
Communicate with other teachers to avoid duplication of units across the years.
Note: Schools will be provided with "Mathematics Expectations Continuum: Grades K-8 which help them to identify where topics overlap

 

Teaching the Grades Together by Combining the Teacher’s Guides

Select some units from each grade level
Instruct the class as a whole using a combination of these units
Make modifications where necessary to accommodate each grade level
Communicate with other teachers to avoid duplication of units across the years
Teachers need to be careful that all the expectations for each grade level have been addressed

 

Teaching the Grades in Isolation

Instruct each grade separately
While one group is receiving instruction, the other group engages in another math activity (e.g., exploration centres, continuation of previous day’s Core Activity, suggested "Extensions" or "Additional Lessons" from previous day’s Core Activity, a skills consolidation exercise, problem solving activity, previously-learned games, "Math Journal" or "Word Glossary" writing)
In some classrooms, while one grade is working on mathematics, another may be engaged in work from a different subject area

 

 wpe4.jpg (6241 bytes)

 

Teaching the Grades Separately but Coordinating the Topics

Instruct each group separately but coordinate the topics/Ontario Curriculum expectations for the two grades wherever possible so that the whole class is working on a common theme
Students may be able to work together on some activities

Top Of Page